Monday, July 26, 2021

About That Special 'Investigative' Committee . . .

Statement by Donald J. Trump, 45th President 

of the United States of America

Nancy Pelosi is spending a great deal of time, effort, and money on the formulation of a Fake and highly partisan January 6 Committee to ask, “what happened?” 

 

Will Nancy investigate herself and those on Capitol Hill who didn’t want additional protection, including more police and National Guard, therefore being unprepared despite the large crowd of people that everyone knew was coming? 

 

Will Nancy and her Committee study the massive Voter Fraud that took place during the 2020 Presidential Election, particularly in swing states, that was the reason hundreds of thousands of people came pouring into Washington and, therefore, must be a big factor in the final Committee Report? Now would be a very good time to study the large scale Voter Fraud in our Presidential Election.

 

Will Nancy release the thousands of hours of tapes so we can see the extent to which ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter played a role, while also revealing “who killed Ashli Babbitt?” A real and thorough investigation of this must be done—and what about all of the violence, murders, riots, and fires that took place in Democrat run cities throughout the United States by ANTIFA and Black Lives Matter, with virtually no consequence for this death and destruction?

 

Will Nancy look into the vicious partisan investigations of Conservatives and Republicans that are taking place by prosecutors all over the Country? The five-year investigation of me, and all that so many have been through, including the fake Russia Russia Russia charge, and including the local Democrat-controlled New York prosecutors who work around the clock to get President Donald Trump, while murderers, drug dealers, and human traffickers go free!

Biden Spews Gibberish; Truly Incomphensible!

 

It Would Be Funny It It Wan't So Sad . . .


 

Ever Heard Of Thomas Sowelll? Watch And Learn!

 

Living Through It Once Was More Than Enough!


 

Differentiating Education From Propaganda

Remarks prepared for delivery to my local Board of education tomorrow night:

Good evening. 
I address the board as a resident of this town for more than 40 years, a taxpayer, a former elementary school teacher and university instructor and a lifelong public relations practitioner.  
Education is not indoctrination. Education involves giving students the basic information and tools they need to gradually and deliberately make their own way and draw their own conclusions about the world around them. As John Dewey said: "Education is not an affair of telling and being told." Indeed, education is much more active and dynamic than that. 
Introducing little children (who are not really color conscious) to the idea of race; telling students that racism is systemic, that it's baked in the cake; asserting that white people are automatically privileged oppressors and people of color are automatically oppressed -- none of this is education. Instead, it's propaganda, pure and simple. 
And yet, if some of what I'm hearing and reading is correct, caught up in a near hysteria of "wokeness", the school system and its leaders seem to be headed in precisely that direction -- away from the open, tried and tested tenets of traditional education and toward a radical, dangerous course of indoctrination and enforced restrictions. And some even suspect that you're moving in this direction surreptitiously, hoping that parents and taxpayers won't catch on until it's too late. Well, I'm here tonight to caution you: If this (or anything like it) is the plan, you'd better think and think again before you head any further down that road.  
And I would gently remind you as well that there are many of us whose kids are long since out of school but who are still footing the bill for education in this town. Nobody consulted us. But we're here. We're invested in this town and its children. And we won't stand idly by and watch this happen.  
Put simply, get back to basics. Teach our kids how to learn; how to make themselves useful to one another and to the community; how to be self-sufficient, productive citizens; how to discover their talents and put those talents to use for our town and our nation -- a nation, I might add, that is still very much worthy of the very best we have to offer. 
Thank you!

Yes, He DID Actually Say This . . .




 

Rare Footage: Merman, Judy, Barbra Together!

A very rare clip of three legendary divas as they appeared on the old (and regrettably short-lived) Judy Garland Show on CBS TV. This aired on 10/6/63.



Sunday, July 25, 2021

With Sincere Apologies To The Clampetts . . .


 

He Explains This Legal Issue Better Than We Could

Something We Wish We'd Seen . . .


 

Why Women Look Better In One-Piece Swimsuits

I've been spending a lot of time at the beach lately.

And now, I've been forced to ask this question: Is it my imagination or do most women look better in one-piece bathing suits? Oh, I know that in this "woke" era this may be a loaded question that may get me in a lot of trouble. But "frankly, my dear, I don't give a damn".

I've seen plenty of bodies on the beach -- dozens and dozens of 'em. And I can tell you two things: 1) There are a lot of women who are wearing two-piece bathing suits who absolutely should not be wearing them; and 2) Even the shapeliest women look better -- and sexier -- in a one-piece suit. No matter the shape, hue, figure  or girth of the lady in question, a one-piece suit usually looks better. And, get this: I've checked with a couple of women and they've told me that a one-piece suit is no less comfortable than a top and bottom version. In fact, they tell me that the one-piece is actually more comfortable and easier to wear. 

The simple truth is that a one piece suit better showcases all women. You don't have to be Marilyn Monroe or Elizabeth Taylor (Remember them?) to look great in traditional swimwear. And likewise, you don't have to wear a two-piece (or a bikini or thong) to look sexy. In fact, you may be showing us way too much and leaving too little to our imagination. And that's just not very much fun.

And I'm not necessarily limiting this to female bodies. Let's face it: Most men do not look good in a Speedo or a suit that's obviously too small for them. And yes, men need to be careful about how much they show as well. Truth is they're showing us too many beer bellies, too many love handles too many flabby (and sometimes flappy!) parts. Most guys should stick to surfer trunks or suits that are just above the knee and wear tees on the beach unless they're particularly well-proportioned or ripped. And, spare us trunks that slip below the waist and reveal butt cracks. Buy the right size and/or use the drawstring that comes with the trunk.

BTW: These rules for both men and women are even more applicable the older you get.

And one more thing: In both men and women, a suit that covers more will also cover some of those tattoos that we don't wanna see as well.


Saturday, July 24, 2021

Well, It Sounds Plausible To Us . . .


 

'I Know What A Good Paint Job Is, And . . .'

And, BTW: He's STILL drawing HUGE crowds!

What YOU Can Do Now To Save Lives!


 

ALERT: A Tour-de-Force Tonight In Arizona!

 

Surrender Oure Liberties To YOU? No Way!




 

Who The Hell Does This Woman Think She Is?