Ford has no corroborating witnesses, and even the friend she says was at the party in question has denied being there or knowing Kavanaugh at all. She doesn’t know who invited her to the party, where it took place, how she got there, or how she got home after, by her account, Kavanaugh attacked her. But the problems go beyond gaps in memory. She has offered substantially different accounts about when the attack occurred (she’s previously said it happened in the “mid Eighties,” in her “late teens,” and in the “Eighties.” Now she’s saying it happened in 1982, when she was 15) and how it occurred (her therapist’s notes conflict with her story of the attack, and she has offered different accounts about who attended the party).Click here to read the whole thing!
All of these inconsistencies and omissions are important. None of them help her case.
A wide ranging commentary and dialogue on the media, politics, today's headlines and the popular culture. Always fresh and new every day! Now celebrating our second decade and more than six million page views. Nationally recognized, widely quoted, newsworthy and noteworthy.
Tuesday, October 2, 2018
The Inconsistencies Just Keep Adding Up!
David French with an incisive take on it all in the National Review:
Labels:
Congress,
courts,
Crime,
justice,
Law,
National Review,
Senate,
Supreme Court
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment