Saturday, August 29, 2026

C'mon Now, Ya Know It's The Truth!


 

In Michigan, The Choice Couldn't Be Clearer!

As We Approach The Anniversary, Remember THIS


 

Nearly 3,000 people were murdered on the morning of September 11, 2001. They did not simply “die.” 
They were slaughtered by Islamic terrorists. 
And when someone now recounts September 11 by softening the murder of Americans into passive tragedy, only to recover his moral outrage when discussing America’s response, he reveals where his sympathy and anger actually reside. 
Think about what it takes for a human being to look down from nearly 100 stories and conclude that hitting the pavement at terminal velocity is preferable to what is happening behind them. 
These victims did not choose death because they wanted to die. They chose one form of death because Islamic terrorists had left them facing another… suffocation, incineration, or being crushed beneath a collapsing skyscraper. 
September 11 was the deliberate mass murder of Americans, in their offices, aboard their airplanes, and on American soil, by Islamic terrorists.

OK, So Let's Talk About Reanaming . . .

It's utterly ridiculous that lefties are are bent out of shape over President Trump renaming a lake Lake America and the gulf Gulf of America when they've spent years renaming all of the following:

• Washington Redskins became the Commanders
• Cleveland Indians ➡️ Guardians 
• Stanford Indians ➡️ Cardinals
• Loudoun County Raiders ➡️ Captains
• Edmonton Eskimos ➡️ Elks
• Columbus Day ➡️ Indigenous Peoples’ Day
• Lee–Jackson Day ➡️ eliminated
• Robert E. Lee High School ➡️ John Lewis High
• Jefferson Davis Highway ➡️ Richmond Highway
• Mount McKinley ➡️ Mount Denali
• Fort Bragg ➡️ Fort Liberty
• Fort Hood ➡️ Fort Cavazos
• Boy Scouts of America ➡️ Scouting America
• Aunt Jemima ➡️ Pearl Milling Company
• Uncle Ben’s Rice ➡️ Ben’s Original
• Eskimo Pie ice cream bars ➡️ Edy’s Pie
• Land O’Lakes ➡️ removed the Indian, but kept the land
• Loudoun County Raiders ➡️ Captains
• Edmonton Eskimos ➡️ Elks
• Columbus Day ➡️ Indigenous Peoples’ Day
• Lee–Jackson Day ➡️ eliminated
• Robert E. Lee High School ➡️ John Lewis High
• Jefferson Davis Highway ➡️ Richmond Highway
• Mount McKinley
• Hispanic ➡️ Latinx (a term Hispanics did not want and do not use)
• Mother ➡️ birthing person
• Anchor baby ➡️ child of noncitizens
• Breastfeeding ➡️ chest feeding
• Inmate / prisoner / convict / felon ➡️ justice-involved person
• Ex-con / ex-felon ➡️ returning citizen
• “Gender” as a biological fact interchangeable with “sex” to being a social construct
• Fat ➡️ plus-sized
• Master bedroom ➡️ primary bedroom
• Manhole ➡️ utility hole
And so on . . .

Thursday, August 27, 2026

NJ GOP: Give The Money Back To The Taxpayers

Following the announcement that state tax collections increased by 6.4% in a 13-month period, the 9th Legislative District Delegation is calling for this revenue to be dedicated to property tax relief programs to reduce the cost of living in New Jersey.


During the 13-month period from July 2025 to July 2026, state tax collections increased by $3.194 billion as compared to the previous 13-month period.


In May of this year, Senator Carmen Amato, Jr., Assemblyman Brian Rumpf and Assemblyman Gregory Myhre introduced legislation (S-4306/A-5093) that would make permanent the additional $250 property tax relief benefits that have been paid to senior citizen homeowners and tenants under the ANCHOR Property Tax Relief Program.


The $250 senior ANCHOR benefit was eliminated in the new FY2027 State budget. Many seniors have also seen cuts to the NJ Stay checks or have been made ineligible for the program due to provisions in the State budget, which the 9th District Delegation voted against.


Amato, Rumpf and Myhre issued the following joint statement:


“Taxpayers, not Trenton, should be benefiting from increased tax collections.


“Unquestionably, this money should be returned to taxpayers who are struggling to pay property taxes, electric bills and groceries.


“Cuts to the ANCHOR and NJ Stay programs have hit seniors most severely.


“At the very least, the increased tax collections should restore funding to property tax relief programs on which seniors rely to make ends meet.


“After recently passing a record-setting $61.75 billion State budget, Trenton does not need any more tax revenue to provide services to illegal immigrants, bail out another mismanaged city as it did with Jersey City, fund political pet projects or expand the state bureaucracy.”

A Morally Confused Medical Comparison!

 

CV-logo-slogan_1-14-25

A very special message from catholicvote.org:

 

If you didn’t see Jesse Watters interviewing Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed on Fox News last night, you missed a revealing moment that cuts beneath the usual policy debate to something more fundamental.

 

El-Sayed showed himself to be precisely what Michigan does not need in elected office. Beyond exposing a shallow grasp of basic economics, he made a comparison so medically and morally confused that it lays bare the deeper problem with where certain ideological currents in our politics have arrived.

 

In an exchange about so-called “gender change” surgery, Watters asked El-Sayed whether he supported allowing a doctor to surgically remove a young boy's male anatomy. El-Sayed's response was not a defense of children. It was a deflection: "Are you circumcised?"

 

Watters couldn't believe what he was hearing. His reply, "circumcision is different than castration," expressed what most reasonable people watching already knew.

 

He is right. And the distinction matters enormously.

 

El-Sayed, a physician with an M.D. from Columbia University, placed a minor, medically routine procedure that does nothing to alter the function of the human body on the same moral and clinical level as a surgery that permanently destroys a child's capacity to father children.

 

Circumcision is not castration. One has thousands of years of medical and cultural precedent; the other is an irreversible alteration of a healthy body belonging to a child who has no say in the matter and no ability to reclaim what has been taken once it is gone.

 

This is not a difference of medical opinion, but a failure of basic moral reasoning. And it reveals something about where a particular ideology has arrived: a place where the healthy bodies of children are treated as problems awaiting correction.

 

People who reason this way have disqualified themselves from public trust. 

 

The Watters interview is emblematic of where we stand as a society and of where we must hold the line. Not merely on the political question of who wins in November, but on something prior to politics: the recognition that children are not experiments and that no movement's preferred conclusions change what every serious moral tradition has always understood about the protection of the young.

 

In other words, natural law does not require a theology degree to understand.

 

There are economic and policy reasons aplenty to reject Abdul El-Sayed's candidacy. But what last night's interview made plain is that the deepest stakes in elections like this one are not economic. They concern what we believe about the human person and whether the people we send to govern us are willing to protect children even when an ideology tells them not to.

 

Michigan voters, the ball is in your court.

 

Go forward bravely,

Kelsey sig gray

Kelsey Reinhardt

President & CEO

CatholicVote